Critical Summary Paper Assignment Instructions Overview Complete the following q – graduate researcher

Critical Summary Paper Assignment Instructions
Overview
Complete the following questions for each book assigned to a Required Reading Critical Summary. As these books were selected to provide deep insight to Strategic Communication and how it was formulated, shaped, changed, as well as how it should be applied to your future works, you should be showing a high level of critical thinking in the formulation of your thoughts. Formal APA formatting is required.
Instructions
A well-constructed Critical Summary Paper Assignment will include the following elements:
· Introduction, featuring a fresh and clear thesis.
· Body, featuring major critical points that were themed or critically curated by you, the reader.
· Minimal quotes. Use of quotes should be reserved for making the most significant points.
· Supported by a minimum of 5 scholarly extractions of the author, indicated by in-text citations.
· Strong topic sentences for each paragraph. These should transition and connect ideas, as well as guide the reader through the paper.
· Conclusion, featuring strong statements regarding how the thesis was developed / proven in the body of the paper. This portion of the paper should also make it clear how future research of the subject could be impacted by the ideas here.
Critical Summary Paper Assignments should be a minimum of 750 words.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Critical Summary Paper: Ong Assignment
Ong, W. (2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the world. New York, NY: Routeledge. ISBN: 9780415027960.
Walter Ong brings us through the ideas of technological determinism. He moves us through how relationships, orality, the development of words, and the movement of everyone becoming literate has changed the world. Although Ong does not specifically speak about Strategic Communication, he does address how communication shifts determine power, needs, dependencies and much more.
Q1: In his own way, how does Ong understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would he talk about these transitions?
Q2: What is the significance of second orality? How is this valuable to your research interest?
Q3: How is Ong relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What are two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment?
Critical Summary Paper: Ellul Assignment
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Toronto, Canada: ISBN 9780394703909.
Jacques Ellul challenges the efficient adoption of technique through technology. His concerns raise questions about the inherent logic of its development. Ellul suggests that without a rigorous course of action, de-humanization is the only outcome. Ellul’s through and cautionary considerations, while most commonly associated with twentieth century thought, are vital to the ongoing conversation surrounding Strategic Communication.
Q1: In his own way, how does Ellul understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would talk about these transitions?
Q2: What are three complications from technology highlighted by Ellul? How are these valuable to your research interest?
Q3: How is Ellul relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment?
Critical Summary Paper: Postman Assignment
Postman, N. (1993). Technolopy: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Vintage Books/Random House. ISBN: 9780679745402.
Neil Postman is a self-proclaimed provocateur, yet many interpret him as a chronic pessimist because of his insightful critiques of technology’s impact of culture and life. In particular, his definition of totalitarian technocracy provides a compelling perspective on the impact of technology on everything from communication to physical problems. Postman looks deep into culture shifts and even suggest a theology of technology. Because of his critical insights and challenging spirit, he plays an important role in conversations past, present, and future.
Q1: In his own way, how does Postman understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would one talk about these transitions?
Q2: What is the significance of technolopoly? How are these insights valuable to your research interest?
Q3: How is Postman relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment?
Critical Summary Paper: McLuhan Assignment
McLuhan, M. (1999). The medium and the light: Reflections on religion and media. Eugene, OR: Stoddart. ISBN: 9780415027960.
Marshall McLuhan is regarded for two ideas that have shaped communication conversations—theoretical and practical—for decades: 1) we can NEVER stop communicating, and 2) the medium is the message. As he applies communication to the traditions in the church, it becomes essential to consider how strategic communication can be engaged in a traditionally theological setting. In other words, what happens when strategic communication and spiritual life intersect?
Q1: In his own way, how does McLuhan understand that Strategic Communication transformations are taking place? How would he talk about these transitions in the two unique contexts of the church and the world? Why must we understand both?
Q2: What is the significance of understanding communication mediums? How are these insights valuable to your research interest?
Q3: How is McLuhan relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment?
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the SafeAssign plagiarism tool.