Module Eight: Thinking About History, continued, Learning Block 8-1 (page 1):
 Question 1: Consider the following statement: The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor leading to the settlement of Alaska Native
land claims. Is this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or
two sentences.
 Question 2: Consider the following statement: ANCSA was a fair settlement for Alaska Natives. Is this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented
in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or two sentences.
 Question 3: Consider the following statement: ANCSA led to economic benefits for white Alaskans as well as for Natives. Is this conclusion consistent
with the evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or two sentences.
Module Eight: Thinking About History, continued, Learning Block 8-2 (page 2):
 Question 4: For an American literature course: What skills from this course would you use to develop a brief essay on the significance of Walt Whitman’s
“When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom’d,” a poem written in the summer of 1865?
 Question 5: For a sociology course: What skills from this course would you use to produce an annotated bibliography for your course research project?
 Question 6: For a business course: What skills from this course would you use to decide between two different investment proposals?
Module Eight: Thinking About History, continued, Learning Block 8-3 (page 2):
 Question 7: How can history serve as a lens for the rest of the academic program you will pursue at SNHU? Has this course changed the way you think
about what you want to study? Why or why not?
Module Eight: Thinking About History, continued, Learning Block 8-4 (page 2):
 Question 8: What did you learn about one of these topics or historical events that was new or surprising to you? Explain in at least two to three
sentences.
 Question 9: In one paragraph, explain which parts of your historical investigation and analysis were most interesting to you. Which parts were less
interesting?
Guidelines for Submission: Your responses to Questions 1, 2, and 3 should be 1–2 sentences in length. Your responses to Questions 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 should be 2–
3 sentences in length. Your response to Question 9 should be 1 paragraph in length.

Default image

admin

Articles: 227818

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *